Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 FSUPP 417 - Rannels v. S. E. Nichols, Inc.

Rannels v. S. E. Nichols, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1984
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Cosgrove Studio & Camera Shop, Inc. v. Pane · Nelson v. Keefer · Publix Drug Co. v. Breyer Ice Cream Co. · Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc. · Bausewine v. Norristown Herald, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the issuer had no account with the drawee at the time the check or order was issued; or (2) payment was refused by the drawee for lack of funds, upon presentation within 30 days after issue, and the issuer failed to make good within ten days after receiving notice of that refusal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.