Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 FSUPP 57 - Haire v. Miller

Haire v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1998

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

40197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1396 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Van Dusen v. Barrack · Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman · Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co. · Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court’s ruling that it lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendants does not automatically moot plaintiff’s motion to transfer. A court having subject matter jurisdiction, as this court does, but lacking personal jurisdiction over the defendant, still has authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a) or 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (a) to order a transfer to another district. Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman, 369 U.S. 463, 466 , 82 S.Ct. 913 [915], 8 L.Ed.2d 39 (1962) (transfer under section 1406(a)); Koehring Co. v. Hyde Construction Co., 324 F.2d 295, 297-98 (5th Cir.1963) (transfer under section 1404(a)).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.