447 F. Supp. 2d 1008 - Faegre & Benson, LLP v. Purdy’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Baxter v. Palmigiano · Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp. · Crawford v. Runyon · Squirtco v. Seven-Up Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not alert the Internet user to the protest or critical commentary nature of the attached web site within the language of the domain name itself”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Olivarius v. Mermel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.