Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 MASS 558 - Commonwealth v. Crouse

Commonwealth v. Crouse’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
6
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Frye v. United States · Luce v. United States · White v. Burdick · White v. VanSickel · Commonwealth v. Lanigan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judge has discretion to exclude evidence of a prior conviction, otherwise admissible to be used for impeachment under G. L. c. 233, § 21, if the danger of unfair prejudice resulting from such evidence outweighs its probative value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “published by the National Fire Protection Association suggests that evidence of a canine alert that is not confirmed by laboratory testing should not be considered valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “will not overrule a trial judge's determination as to the proper scope of cross-examination unless the defendant shows a clear abuse of discretion and prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.