Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 NE2D 1144 - Hann v. State

Hann v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2013

10 state decisions

301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 141 Ind. App. 247 - General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Lasalle Realty Corp. · 167 Ind. App. 541 - Daly v. Nau · Bottoms v. B & M COAL CORP. · Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Sherry · 71 Ind. App. 390 - New York Central Railroad v. Reidenbach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n property damage actions where the property is repairable or restorable, damages may be proved (a) by proof of the difference between the fair market value thereof immediately before and immediately after the traumatic event, or (b) by proof of the cost to repair or restore the property, accompanied by proof (1) of the actual physical damage to the property sustained as a proximate result of the traumatic event, (2) the cost to repair such damage was reasonable, and (3) such cost to repair bears a reasonable relationship to the difference between the fair market value of the property just before and just after the traumatic event, at the option of the party bearing the burden of proof, together with proof of any other amounts reasonably expended as a proximate result of the wrongful act.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.