Poole v. Corwin’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2007
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 168 Ind. App. 159 - Letson v. Lowmaster · 179 Ind. App. 592 - Kline v. Kramer · Hinkley v. . State of New York · 146 Ohio St. 497 - Hinman v. Barnes · 181 Ind. App. 295 - Tekulve v. Turner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"'The defendant, Yankeetown Dock Corporation, having filed its motion for summary judgment pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 56 and the Court having considered the pleadings herein, the interrogatories and answers thereto and the affidavits filed herein, and having heard argument by the respective parties herein, now finds that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact herein as to the defendant, Yankeetown Dock Corporation, and that said defendant, Yankee-town Dock Corporation is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Court finds that on June 1, 1977, Oscar Evans, plaintiff's decedent, and Harlan Miller, were co-employees of the defendant, Yankeetown Dock Corporation, being employed at the Yankeetown Dock facility at Yankeetown, Warrick County, Indiana. That on said date, Oscar Evans was shot and killed by Harlan Miller and that the death of Oscar Evans was the result of an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment by Yankeetown Dock Corporation. Based on the above and foregoing, the Court finds that the shooting and resulting death of Oscar Evans on June 1, 1977 was an accident which arose out of and in the course of Oscar Evans employment by Yankeetown Dock Corporation and that the sole and exclusive remedy therefor against Yankeetown Dock Corporation is under and pursuant to the Workmen's Compensation Laws of the State of Indiana pursuant to Indiana Code Section 22-3-2-6. The Court finds that the motion for summary judgment on behalf of Ya”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When hostile acts are so manifest and notorious that a reasonable owner should have been aware of them, no further notice is required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Herrell v. Casey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.