Montgomery v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · 91 Okla. Crim. 326 - Fry v. State · 63 Okla. Crim. 84 - Chesser v. State · 4 Okla. Crim. 523 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Statements of the prosecuting attorney, in argument to the jury, ‘why couldn’t they contradict the state’s testimony, but not one place do they do that,’ and T say again there is no evidence offered to contradict the state’s evidence in this case’ held not a comment upon the failure of the defendant to testify as a witness in his own behalf * * * .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hair v. State · Rodgers v. State““The U.S. Supreme Court did not hold in the Miranda decision that voluntary statements, made by an accused in custody, are inadmissible. Instead, that decision holds that voluntary statements of an accused in custody may be admissible into evidence, under circumstances shown to be free of coercion, and especially when such statements were truly voluntarily made, as in this case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Edwards v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.