Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 P3D 355 - Noyce v. State

Noyce v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Padilla v. Kentucky · United States v. Broce · Alleyne v. United States · Alleyne v. United States · State v. Jamison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether (1) the movant provides persuasive reasons or circumstances that prevented him or her from filing the 60-1507 motion within the 1-year time limitation; (2) the merits of the movant's claim raise substantial issues of law or fact deserving of the district court's consideration; and (3) the movant sets forth a colorable claim of actual innocence, i.e., factual, not legal, innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “obviously unfair or shocking to the conscience.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.