Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 Pa. 500 - Commonwealth v. Cephas

Commonwealth v. Cephas’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
5
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently September 2003 · most notably Pirtle v. State (1975), Commonwealth v. Delbridge (2003)

50 state decisions

3801972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Weeks v. United States · Elkins v. United States · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`become so attenuated as to dissipate the taint.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Of course, this does not mean that the facts thus obtained become sacred and inaccessible. If knowledge of them is gained from an independent source they may be proved like any others, but the knowledge gained by the Government’s own wrong conduct cannot be used by it in the way proposed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “. . . `whether, granting establishment of the primary illegality, the evidence to which instant objection is made has been come at by exploitation of that illegality or instead by means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.