Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 So. 2d 193 - Rowell v. State

447 So. 2d 193 - Rowell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2010

11 state decisions

901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Iannelli v. United States · Illinois v. Vitale · Racine v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The applicable rule is that, where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"It is not required, to sustain a conviction for burglary, that the intended act was consummated. Hamilton v. State , 270 Ala. 184 , 116 So.2d 906 (1960); Holland v. State , 247 Ala. 53 , 22 So.2d 519 (1945); Howard v. State , 355 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978). Consequently, it was not necessary for the State to prove a completed crime of harassment." Rowell v. State , 447 So.2d 193 , 196 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), cert. quashed , 447 So.2d 196 (Ala. 1984).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.