447 So. 2d 199 - Willis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
130 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Coral v. State (1992), 494 So. 2d 124 - Magwood v. State (1985)
130 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Young v. State · 363 So. 2d 1020 - Thomas v. State · 387 So. 2d 280 - Gunn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, this Court must accept as true the evidence introduced by the State, accord the State all legitimate inferences therefrom, and consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Barnes v. State · Williams v. State“"The action of the trial court in denying a motion for judgment of acquittal must be reviewed by determining whether there exists legal evidence before the jury, at the time the motion is made, from which the jury by fair inference could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coral v. State“The appellate courts look with disfavor on motions for new trials based on newly discovered evidence and the decision of the trial court will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.