Joseph v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2005
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hill v. United States · Davis v. United States · Rodriguez v. New York · 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“without undue delay [will] move the trial court to vacate his [two] convictions under Rule 3.850 in reliance on this decision, we direct the trial court to grant [Bourgault] such relief and a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“share a uniqueness about the perpetrator of the offense or the manner in which the offenses were committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“fundamental defect[ ] which inherently result[s] in a miscarriage of justice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.