Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 SO2D 296 - Fowler v. State

Fowler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Apfelbaum · Purcell v. Deli Man, Inc. · C. D. W. v. State · 104 So. 2d 524 - Gordon v. State · 321 So. 2d 453 - McDonald v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “WHETHER THE FLORIDA BAR V. DOE, 384 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1980), BARS THE STATE FROM USING STATEMENTS MADE BY THE DEFENDANT UNDER A GRANT OF IMMUNITY IN PROSECUTION (a) FOR PERJURY BY LATER CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS UNDER SECTION 837.021; AND (b) FOR PERJURY UNDER SECTION 837.02?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.