Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 So. 2d 778 - Erbe v. Eady

447 So. 2d 778 - Erbe v. Eady’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2015

17 state decisions

701984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · Friedland v. United States · 441 So. 2d 980 - Walker v. CAROLINA MILLS LUMBER CO., INC. · 406 So. 2d 939 - Thomas v. Thomas · 406 So. 2d 936 - Erbe v. Eady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a case is remanded to a trial court after a decision on appeal, ‘issues decided by the appellate court become law of the case and the trial court’s duty is to comply with the appellate mandate....’ Walker v. Carolina Mills Lumber Co., 441 So.2d 980, 982 (Ala.Civ.App.1983). The trial court is not free to reconsider issues finally decided in the mandate. Instead, “ ‘[i]f circumstances arise that cast doubt on the correctness of the law of the case as established on appeal, arguments in support of departure from the mandate must be addressed to the appéllate court,....’ “1B Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 0.404[10] (2d ed.1983) (citations omitted).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[i]f circumstances arise that cast doubt on the correctness of the law of the case as established on appeal, arguments in support of departure from the mandate must be addressed to the appellate court, . . .' 1B Moore's Federal Practice , Paragraph 0.404[10] (2d ed. 1983) (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.