George v. George’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 390 So. 2d 652 - Coffelt v. Coffelt · Lewis v. Lewis · Mack v. Mack · 434 So. 2d 794 - Rothchild v. Rothchild
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To determine whether the trial court abused its discretion, we must look to all of the aspects of the divorce judgment and not merely to the lack of any periodic alimony award to the wife.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Austin v. Austin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.