Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 SO2D 864 - Webb v. State

Webb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1999
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · 420 So. 2d 812 - Harris v. State · 401 So. 2d 288 - Myers v. State · 339 So. 2d 1063 - Balentine v. State · 339 So. 2d 1070 - Balentine v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When there is a conflict in the evidence surrounding the taking of the confession, and there is sufficient evidence to support the trial court's finding, this court will not disturb the finding of the trial court on appeal, unless it appears contrary to the great weight of the evidence, or is manifestly wrong, or unjust. The trial judge need only be convinced from a preponderance of the evidence that the confession was knowingly and voluntarily made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.