Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 SO2D 974 - Ballance v. State

Ballance v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 1995
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Green v. State · 347 So. 2d 1021 - Fresneda v. State · Frank v. State · 362 So. 2d 29 - Cuba v. State · Winfield v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The determination of the amount of restitution is a non-delegable judicial responsibility, as is the determination of the defendant's ability to pay, i.e. by establishing a rate of payment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in an amount to be determined by the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) monitor the defendant’s economic circumstances during the probationary period; (2) notify the court at such time as the defendant appears to have the ability to commence restitution payments; and (3) furnish the court with a recommended payment schedule. However, before any such payment schedule is adopted by the court, the defendant must be afforded the opportunity to be heard on his ability to comply therewith. 447 So.2d at 976 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.