Cherry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2004
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Michigan National Bank v. Michigan · Ex Parte Reyes · Branch v. State · Harrington v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The enhanced penalty statutes have been held valid against all constitutional attack. 1 Branch’s Ann.P.C., 2nd ed., Sec. 698, p. 681. See also Mackie v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 367 S.W.2d 697 ; Young v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 498 , 341 S.W.2d 911 ; Spencer v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 389 S.W.2d 304 ; Ex parte Reyes, Tex.Cr.App., 383 S.W.2d 804 . We cannot agree with appellant that such statutes constitute cruel and unusual punishment or result in double jeopardy in violation of state and federal constitutional provisions. See Spencer v. Texas, 385 U. S. 554 , 87 S.Ct. 648 , 17 L.Ed.2d 606 , 611 and cases there cited.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Franks v. State · Thrash v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.