Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 SW2D 479 - Brewer v. Tedford

Brewer v. Tedford’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dallas Farm MacHinery Company v. Reaves · Denman v. Hall · Holt v. Gordon · Dee v. Parish · Martin v. Coastal States Gas Producing Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has been held that conditionally delivered instruments do not become effective until the condition occurs. 17 C.J.S. Contracts § 64, pp. 738, 739 ; 32A C.J.S. Evidence § 977, p. 459. We think the following quotation from 13 Tex.Jur.2d 228-29, Contracts § 83, is clearly in point and bears directly on the case before us: ‘Clearly, where there is a specified condition attached to the delivery of a written contract, delivery of the instrument will not become absolute, nor the agreement effective, until the happening of the condition * * * ‘The conditional delivery of a written instrument involves a question as to the mutual intention of the parties. This question may properly be resolved by the jury. Furthermore, when determining the existence of such a delivery, the condition itself, together with the true facts and circumstances of the case, may be shown by parol evidence.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.