Aekins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “If only. a single statutory provision is at issue, then the elements analysis ends in the defendant’s favor, and we move on to a units analysis.”). . Price v. State, 434 S.W.3d 601, 609 (Tex. Crim.App.2014). . Blockburger, 284 U.S. at 304 , 52 S.Ct. 180 . . Ex parte Amador, 326 S.W.3d 202 , 206 n.5 (Tex.Crim.App.2010) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Benson, Yusulf Shaheed

2. “For offenses to be the 'same' for double-jeopardy purposes, they must be the same both in 'law' and in 'fact.' "). "The legal-sameness inquiry depends on only the pleadings and statutory law-not the record-to ascertain whether two offenses are the same.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Donaldson

3. “[I]n Texas, as in many other jurisdictions, a defendant may not be convicted for a completed sexual assault by penetration and also for conduct (such as contact) that is demonstrably and inextricably part of that single sexual assault.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Villarreal v. State