Barry v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2018
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 6324
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Kegley v. District of Columbia · Johnson v. Board of Appeals and Review · Jones v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board · Money v. Cullinane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he trial court, uncertain of its role as a reviewing court ... heard additional evidence in the case and did not confine itself to reviewing the evidence in the administrative record.... The fact that the trial court clearly erred, however, does not preclude our independent review of the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re At“if the action [was] in some manner otherwise arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion or contrary to law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re At“10 . Under the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act, (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.