Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 448 F.2d 298 - United States v. Cisneros

United States v. Cisneros’s Empirical Analysis

448 F.2d 298 · 1971

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
5
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

62 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably United States v. Morgan (1984), United States v. Vasquez (1980)

62 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions

50019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3109 · 21 U.S.C. § 878 (§ 508 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 7607 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · McDonald v. United States · Miller v. United States · Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trier of fact is not compelled to accept and believe the self serving stories of vitally interested defendants. Their evidence may not only be disbelieved, but from the totality of the circumstances, including the manner in which they testify, a contrary conclusion may be properly drawn.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Assuming a valid basis for *1168 arrest, an illegal method of execution, for instance an unlawful forcible entry, can result in the exclusion of any evidence obtained as a result of the officer’s illegal conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “refusal of entrance to a known law officer can be considered as a factor in establishing probable cause”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.