Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 448 F.2d 477 - Boyd v. United States

Boyd v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

448 F.2d 477 · 1971

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2003

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1401971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Davis v. Attorney General of United States · Ernest J. Jackson v. Attorney General of the United States, No. 71-2024 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The thrust of Davis is to the effect that denial of state bail must be caused by the federal detainer. If state bail is granted, petitioner is then free to seek federal bail and no credit for state custody is allowed. As a corollary, it seems useless for a prisoner to make state bail if immediate federal custody-not subject to bail-is to follow. Consequently, in those two instances the courts will grant credit towards a subsequent federal sentence for the 'jail time' in state custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.