United States v. Likas’s Empirical Analysis
448 F.2d 607 · 1971
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 1995
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 3109
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Ker v. State of California · Miller v. United States · Sabbath v. United States · Gilbert v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The officer may break open any outer or inner door or window of a house, or any part of a house, or anything therein, to execute a search warrant, if, after notice of his authority and purpose, he is refused admittance or when necessary to liberate himself or a person aiding him in the execution of the warrant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The United States Supreme Court has never broadened the application of § 3109 beyond its own restricted terms,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.