Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

448 F.2d 643

Docket No. 26643.

United States v. O'Brien

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

August 18, 1971.

Rehearing Denied October 21, 1971.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-08-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1971

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Wood

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1971-08-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Michael E. Somers (argued), of Somers, Fox & Kallen, Santa Monica, Cal., for appellant.

Andrew R. Willing, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

¶1

O'Brien was convicted for his refusal of induction into the Armed Forces, in violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 462. On appeal, O'Brien makes numerous claims, only one of which may have been thought to have possible merit. This is the contention that the State Selective Service Director had authorized a reopening of O'Brien's late-matured conscientious objector claim in a letter recommending that the local board follow Local Board Memorandum No. 41 and grant O'Brien a "courtesy interview." However, this argument was recently resolved, adversely to O'Brien's position, in United States v. Wood, 446 F.2d 505, 506 n. 1 (9th Cir. 1971).

¶2

Affirmed.

Notes:

*

Honorable Gus J. Solomon, United States District Judge, Portland, Oregon, sitting by designation

/448/f2d/643 · .json · Public domain