Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 448 F.3d 1000 - Woldemichael v. Ashcroft

Woldemichael v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

448 F.3d 1000 · 2006

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2024

8 federal appellate ·

80200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Nagoulko v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Ngure v. Ashcroft · Feleke v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Woldemeskel v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Rife v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any person who is outside any country of such person’s nationality ... and who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of, that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.