Danner v. Motley’s Empirical Analysis
448 F.3d 372 · 2006
Citation profile
20 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Estelle v. McGuire · Bourjaily v. United States · Maryland v. Craig · United States v. Scheffer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the state court did not assess the merits of a claim properly raised in a habeas petition, the deference due under AEDPA does not apply and we conduct our review de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Matthews v. Ishee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.