Goodrich v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
448 F.3d 45 · 2006
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2025
10 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Picard v. Connor · Costello v. United States · Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States · United States v. Mechanik
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here a defendant seeks dismissal of the indictment before there is a petit jury verdict, such relief 'is appropriate only if it is established that the violation substantially influenced the grand jury's decision to indict,' or if there is 'grave doubt' that the decision to indict was free from the substantial influence of such violations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]here a habeas petition can easily be denied on other grounds, there is no need to do a Teague analysis first.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.