Patterson’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2022
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Little v. Liquid Air Corp. · Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. Calhoun · Browning v. Navarro · Brill v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. · Arnold v. Garlock, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The application of § 1453(c)(1) is therefore limited to the context of CAFA.”)); Saab v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 469 F.3d 758, 759-60 (8th Cir.2006) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“CAFA provides only for review of a remand order premised on the prerequisites of § 1453 or on claims with an adequate nexus to CAFA”);”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.