448 F. Supp. 2d 185 - Clayborne v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Aka v. Washington Hospital Center · Greene v. Dalton · Chevron Inc v. Echazabal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n employer may escape liability under the Rehabilitation Act if it can establish that the employee poses a direct threat to himself or others.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was a direct and substantial threat to her own safety as demonstrated by her repeated workplace accidents”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.