448 F. Supp. 2d 228 - Curran v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Tuttle v. Raymond · Plumley v. Southern Container, Inc. · ATC Realty, LLC v. Town of Kingston · Rippett v. Bemis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a plaintiff may recover for emotional harm, including emotional distress, mental anguish, and loss of the enjoyment of life as part of the recovery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.