448 F. Supp. 2d 595 - Malcom v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Plummer v. Apfel · Morales v. Apfel · Williams v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]hat is not to say, of course, that another agency’s decision is determinative. On the contrary, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has noted that ‘the determinations of other government or non-government agencies are not binding on social security benefits decisions.... * * * Although the VA’s determination in plaintiffs case was not that he was totally or permanently disabled, that agency did find him eligible for disability benefits. It is not clear that the VA’s decision was considered by the ALJ in this case and therefore the case will be remanded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.