Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 448 MD 242 - Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · United States v. Cortez · New York v. Belton · Arizona v. Gant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we defer to that court's findings of fact unless we determine them to be clearly erroneous, and, in making that determination, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the party who prevailed on that issue, in this case the State. We review the [suppression] court's conclusions of law, however, and its application of the law to the facts, without deference.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.