Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 448 NW2D 327 - Henrich v. Lorenz

Henrich v. Lorenz’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2019

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. Bohlken · Tigges v. City of Amess · Valadez v. City of Des Moines · Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Parr · Kerrigan v. Errett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The usual meaning assigned to "willful," "wanton," or "reckless," according to taste as to the word used, is that the actor has intentionally done an act of an unreasonable character in disregard of a known or obvious risk that was so great as to make it highly probable that harm would follow, and which thus is usually accompanied by a conscious indifference to the consequences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “under Iowa Code section 85.20: (1) knowledge of the peril to be apprehended; (2) knowledge that injury is a probable, as opposed to a possible, result of the danger; and (3) a conscious failure to avoid the peril. We have stringently maintained that an injured worker must prove all of the elements of the Thompson test in order to establish a coworker's”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This concept of wantonness 'involves the combination of attitudes: a realization of imminent danger, coupled with a reckless disregard or lack of concern for the probable consequences of the act.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.