Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 448 P2D 608 - Cederburg v. Carter

Cederburg v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2007

16 state decisions

10019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zimberg v. United States · Wallace v. United States · Lee v. Crittenden County · 87 Cal. App. 2d 913 - Schwenger v. Gaither · Pickett v. Cooper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * In any event, appellant fails to show us, either by authority or reason, how the ruling could have been prejudicial to defendant. On appeal, the appellant has the burden of showing harmful error. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.