State v. Savoie’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably 750 So. 2d 832 - State v. Snyder (1999), 598 So. 2d 454 - State v. Powell (1992)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Mucci v. United States · 420 So. 2d 1126 - State v. Graham · City of Polson, Montana v. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana · 439 So. 2d 1099 - State v. Korman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a sound discretion to stop the prolonged, unnecessary and irrelevant examination of a witness.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sims · State v. Carter“"The party seeking to use the statement must first comply strictly with the requirements of LSA-R.S. 15:493 to avoid surprise and allow the witness to explain the inconsistency. State v. West, 437 So.2d 256 (La.1983). The rationale for such a strict foundation is to obviate surprise and to let the witness either deny or explain the inconsistency. State v. Heard, 408 So.2d 1247 (La.1982)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bowman“If oral argument goes beyond these limits, it may fall within the ambit of La.C. Cr.P. arts. 770 and 771. When such remarks are made in the presence of the jury, either a mistrial or an admonition may be proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.