448 So. 2d 339 - Ex Parte Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"The burden of proving that venue is improper in the county in which a suit is brought is upon the party making such a claim. Ingram v. Omelet Shoppe, Inc., 388 So.2d 190 (Ala.1980); Medical Service Administration v. Dickerson, 362 So.2d 906 (Ala.1978); Johnson Publishing Co. v. Davis, 271 Ala. 474 , 124 So.2d 441 (1960). When a party petitions for writ of mandamus to set aside an order transferring venue, this Court is to ascertain whether the trial court abused its discretion or exercised it in an arbitrary and capricious manner. Ex parte Wilson, 408 So.2d 94 (Ala.1981)."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 915 So. 2d 34 - Ex Parte Flexible Products Co. · 915 So. 2d 34 - Bice v. Micon Products International, Inc.

2. “is unable to determine as a matter of fact whether the corporations were doing business in Madison County at the time the cause of action arose,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 743 So. 2d 1071 - Ex Parte Wiginton

3. “[a] foreign corporation may be sued in any county in which it does business by agent.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ex Parte Reliance Ins. Co.