448 So. 2d 404 - Ex Parte Washington’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 81 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Haney v. State (1991), 549 So. 2d 122 - Holladay v. State (1988)
2 federal appellate · 81 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 361 So. 2d 1106 - Chavers v. State · PEOPLE, BY RUSSEL v. District Court for Fourth JD · 402 So. 2d 1081 - Crumpton v. State · Ex Parte Hightower · 47 Ala. App. 189 - Passmore v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Having concluded that the defendant did preserve the alleged error, we must determine whether the oral charge constituted a fatal variance from the indictment.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Geter v. State · Adams v. State“"Section 13A-6-2 (a)(2) [reckless murder] requires a showing that the defendant's conduct was directed at human life in general as opposed to a particular individual. This additional difference between the offense he was indicted for , intentional murder, and universal malice murder precludes the latter from being an included offense, since it can be established only by *Page 212 a showing of facts not required in order to be convicted of intentional murder under § 13A-6-2 (a)(1)."”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“objection must be specific enough to point out the alleged error so as to allow the judge to correct [that] error”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.