448 So. 2d 463 - McMillian v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2011
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Atkinson · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Central South Carolina Chapter v. Martin · Enmund v. Florida · United States v. Chaney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he admission of a mug shot into evidence does not constitute plain error. We do not find that this alleged error `seriously threaten(s) the fairness or integrity of the judicial proceeding.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] prima facie case of robbery in the first degree may be based on the testimony of the victim. Pickett v. State, 417 So.2d 589, 591 (Ala.Cr.App.1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[C]onflicting evidence presents a jury question not subject to review provided the State's evidence establishes a prima facie case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.