448 So. 2d 474 - Vick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““[TJhere is the question of proper jurisdiction for this writ. From the record, it appears that the Corrections Department has housed the appellants in at least threb different locations since the time of the incident. Since the statutes of this State do not specifically cover this situation, we feel that the court in which the petition was originally filed should retain jurisdiction [assuming jurisdiction in that county was correct at that time]. Otherwise, we would have the situation in which appellants could not pursue their remedies to a final determination because of their arbitrary and periodic relocation by the Corrections Department.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 675 So. 2d 557 - State v. Henley

2. “"The rule requiring `substantial evidence' means that an inmate will not be found guilty except by an appropriate quantum of evidence. If a prison official finds an inmate guilty, it is the responsibility of the reviewing courts to determine whether the decision was based on substantial evidence or whether the decision was arbitrary. Aikens v. Lash , 514 F.2d 55 (7th Cir. 1975)."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 461 So. 2d 1335 - Williams v. State