Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

448 So. 2d 68

Cunningham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-04-10

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1989

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-04-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court’s written order revoking the defendant’s probation does not conform to its oral pronouncement finding that the defendant had not violated conditions 6 and 9, and upon remand, these findings should be stricken from the written order. In all other respects, the order revoking probation is affirmed.

¶2Affirmed as modified.

/448/so2d/68 · .json · Public domain