Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 448 SO2D 798 - State v. Russell

State v. Russell’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 419 So. 2d 858 - State v. Raymo · 383 So. 2d 1006 - State v. Peoples · 394 So. 2d 259 - State v. Temple · 393 So. 2d 1216 - State Ex Rel. Womack v. Blackburn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, if in some fashion — either through a motion for a new trial, assignments of error filed in the trial court, or as here, where the court happens to review assignments which are briefed but not filed — the court determines that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction, then it is our obligation to address this issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.