Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 448 SW2D 388 - Hood v. Commonwealth

Hood v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2003

3 state decisions

1019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Waggonner · Shapiro v. Thompson · Cowan v. Commonwealth · Manning v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The thrust of Miranda relates to actions of law enforcement agencies, and not to the actions of private citizens. We have no hesitancy in holding that Miranda does not apply in the instant case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.