Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston))
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Boykin v. State · Brooks v. State · Hooper v. State · Narvaiz v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We hold that (1) the phrase 'repeated telephone communications’ does not require the communications to occur within a certain time frame in relation to one another, and (2) a facially legitimate reason for the communication does not negate per se an element of the statute.”). See also id. at 422-23, 425. 16 . Id. at 426 (Keller, P.J. concurring, joined by Johnson, J.) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“makes repeated telephone communications ... in a manner reasonably likely to harass ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wagner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.