Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 448 SW3D 861 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Murray · State v. Clark · State v. Roe · State v. Drisdel · State v. Hendrix

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A hearsay statement is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Generally, hearsay statements are inadmissible. The hearsay rule does not render inadmissible what the victim said unless his statements are offered for the truth of what he said. An out-of-court statement that is not offered for its truth is not hearsay, and therefore, is admissible even if it does not fall within a recognized exception to the hearsay rule. Testimony of what another said offered in explanation of conduct rather than as proof of the facts in the other's statement is not inadmissible hearsay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of voir dire is to discover bias or prejudice in order to select a fair and impartial jury.... To this end, courts allow a liberal latitude in the examination of venirepersons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.