¶1Appeal from C. A. 1st Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Mr. Justice Rehnquist, being of the view that the order of the Court of Appeals “amending its mandate” to embrace the invalidation of an entirely separate statute is not governed by FTC v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Co., 344 U. S. 206 (1952), dissents from dismissal of the appeal and would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
448 U.S. 901
King v. Preterm, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 30, 1980
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1980-06-30
Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-06-30
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Planned Parenthood v. Arizona (1983), 173 Cal. App. 3d 1187 - Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California v. Swoap (1985)
17 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →