Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 F.2d 1017 - Justin v. Jacobs

Justin v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis

449 F.2d 1017 · 1971

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
6
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 6 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Cervantes v. Walker (1978), In Re John Ballay, A/K/A Figeret Hoxha, Patient (1973)

35 federal appellate · 6 district · 12 state decisions

50019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1865 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Stovall v. Denno · Fay v. Noia · Benton v. Maryland · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Powell v. McCormack

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “case is moot only if it is shown that there is no possibility that any collateral legal consequence will be imposed on the basis of the challenged conviction,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “mentally ill and, because of that illness, . . . likely to injure himself or other persons if allowed to remain at liberty . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “incapable, by reason of mental or physical infirmity, [of rendering] . . . satisfactory jury service”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.