Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 F.2d 115 - Ruben H. Johnson v. James Matthew Radford, II

Ruben H. Johnson v. James Matthew Radford, II’s Empirical Analysis

449 F.2d 115 · 1971

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably The Canal Authority of the State of Florida v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, the Cross-Florida Canal Association v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, Eleanor H. Miller v. Avery S. Fullerton, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States Army, J. G. Perko v. The Canal Authority of the State of Florida, Etc. (1974), Southwest Airlines Co. v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. (1977)

39 federal appellate · 1 district ·

300197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2283

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Woods Exploration & Producing Co. v. Aluminum Co. of America · Southern California Petroleum Corp. v. Harper · Jacksonville Blow Pipe Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A temporary injunction is intended to be temporary, to meet the exigencies of the situation, and necessarily at times lacks the degree of precision which may be required on final decree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.