In Re James P Stump’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1998
2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 294 F. Supp. 34 - Green v. Cotton Concentration Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inquire whether, if a prisoner has no cash credit at the moment of filing, he had disabled himself by a recent drawing on his account and if so, for what purposes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A) plaintiff, even though of small means, could reasonably be asked to some small degree to “put his money where his mouth is,” it being all too easy to file suits, even with sufficient pro forma allegations, if it costs nothing whatever to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.