United States v. Willoz’s Empirical Analysis
449 F.2d 1321 · 1971
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4401 · 26 U.S.C. § 4412 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 26 U.S.C. § 7208
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Marchetti v. United States · Grosso v. United States · United States v. United States Coin & Currency · United States v. Knox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If upon remand, the district court finds that the supplemental Form 11-C was the product of duress by Agent Perry rather than a voluntary exercise of the will of the defendant Willoz, then the verdict and consequent judgment must be vacated and the indictment against Willoz dismissed. If the court reaches a contrary determination, the conviction shall stand affirmed by this court as entered.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“niggardly nature of the Government's answers to the bill of particulars”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the defendant was neither surprised nor prejudiced”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.